The Crossing Down
In days to come you will have good use of this
such are the things you will see you who will come here.
Go to your right...
|Nasa's Official Truth About Nibiru|
today this is the time when sitting down and talking with a very knowledgeable
space scientist like Dr. Morrison might be important at least for
me and hopefully important for him as well. I saw the Object and I
know I can shed light on the situation. Just to start with the physical
theory for making the moon and its geochemical prediction not matching
observations problem is instantly understood when you realize that
the impactor Theia or Nibiru if you will, remained intact. It
looks to me like it was a giant hit and run impact event instead.
is a basic fundamental thing to know. Then unbelievably it's way more
complicated than that but I can help at least up to whatever point.
Later after the Object has returned home it will be to late for me to make a difference. It would still be interesting for me to have a chance to talk with a solar system scientist or two. It is doubtful that they would have any reason or need to talk to me after the Object's next safe return because after all they'll know what happens by then because obviously they will have suddenly finally seen for themselves exactly what happens. So at that point there'll be nothing I can offer them that they won't already know. I'm guessing that by then the important urgent need that I have today to actually really talk directly with people who can make a difference will have faded and will be gone. At that point I will be looking back with the benefit of hindsight after the Object's return. I wonder how the world will look to me on that day that will hopefully come?
The point and the reason why I'm doing this page is because I do want to be able to meet and talk with a space scientist today. Perhaps doing this page will serve in small part. So far the only reaction I have received is that I have been blocked from following @NASAGoddard on Twitter and I am blocked from viewing @NASAGoddard tweets. I think that happened shortly after I mentioned rotational frame dragging and gravitational lensing in a tweet discussing trying to understand how the Object's forces change the Moon's light.
known for a long time that more than likely unfortunately very few
people will have a chance to read about what happens from the Return
Viewer's Guides before the Object gets here. If the right
people are informed then quick action can follow. From important viewing
information for people before the Object safely arrives home and changes
the light from the Moon through to timely worldwide concrete measures
to secure vital infrastructure in the event that there is some sort
of negative impact felt by the Earth as a result of the speeding Object's
next orbit across down through between the Moon and the Earth.
Nasa's Truth About Nibiru Video
are many problems with the situation today and the main one is that
people including Nasa scientists don't know about the Object. This
unfortunate situation has lead to the situation today, a situation
where unfortunately Nasa, the main people I think of as sort of being
the worldwide leaders in basically everything space science have very
little or basically nothing to offer the people of the world in regards
to the astronomical object that crosses down through between the Moon
and the Earth, probably Theia. This is so incredible to me so much
so that I barely know where to begin. One day after the high tech
dark ages of today are finally over the people in the future will
look back on our old era in human history from their new era in human
history and they'll be completely blown away by the way the world
is today without people knowing about the Object and the Moon's Changed
and Lasting Light.
Hi, my name is David Morrison.
obvious question I have to ask myself is this, does Dr. Morrison know
about the retrograde Object that I saw?
Nibiru may or may not be one of the many ancient names used for the Object I have no way to confirm this. Clearly today even if the name Nibiru is not a name that was ever used for the Object today people associate the name Nibiru with some sort of astronomical object that returns even though they don't have any real idea what that astronomical object really does or what it looks like or how it behaves or how it rolls forward as it crosses down across between the Moon and the Earth. I give people credit for being convinced that there is some sort of returning object including the Planet nine scientists. It appears as if some people base their beliefs on ancient texts and legends from around the world and other people base their beliefs on their newly discovered gravitational Planet nine evidence as is the case with the astronomers who actually do know that there's another astronomical object out there they just haven't actually discovered the Object yet but they will sooner or later. I don't know the whole story about the name Nibiru but fundamentally people who use this name are correct in at least an overall general sense because there is another astronomical object that is a member of the solar system that has not been described and recognized in our time and point in world history and as it turns out it returns like the legends say.
This so overwhelmingly huge and off the scale in importance! Because of this fact the size of the shock that will happen across the board when the returning retrograde Object is detected and reported to the world by responsible persons is something I can only barely glimpse. It's going to be a shock beyond measure guaranteed. Importantly as I always have to say it will be obvious that the Object can orbit between the Moon and the Earth safely because my descriptions of the Object will match with astronomical observations that will be made of the Object.
I sure hope there's no danger. The last two times the Object crossed down the Object's crossing does appear to have occurred safely. The other side of this question is unknown to me. The speeding massive retrograde Object can orbit between the Moon and the Earth safely. This is a fact that won't be clear at first but a fact that will be clear when it is obvious that my description of the Standing Stone Crater covered forward rolling moon coloured speeding astronomical Object matches exactly with the new body they suddenly find themselves observing. This is important because instantly they will know that there is such a thing as a safe Return and basically it's as simple as that. At this point the scientific community has the responsibility to make sure that the world's people know for a fact that the Object can cross safely. This is a basic fundamental responsibility that many people will suddenly face. Compare my descriptions with the new object you will be very startled to have suddenly detected traveling nearly directly at the Earth. Eventually you will realize that I do describe this Object. A challenging time and a very tense situation is about to confront all of those people concerned who will know about this because of the important various scientific fields that they work in. Make sure that people know that the Object can return safely! This is a fact, beyond this point there are no guarantees and many troubling questions that I don't have answers to but I go on what happened last time the Object was here crossing safely down
If you can determine the date and time that the scientists lost and then reacquired contact with their lunar experiments you will be on the trail of the celestial Object I saw and describe on this website. If someone was able to confirm this date from other sources this would be important. I saw the Object and then many years later I learned that "they" detected the Object I saw when they lost their signals from the lunar surface.
you find information or the report and this event's designation
number, and it does have a designation number, you will know when
nasa had their anomaly. Nasa claimed to have solved this anomaly
mystery by computer means whatever that is suppose to mean.
what I understand every Apollo mission after Apollo 11, excluding
Apollo 13, deployed a Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package
(ALSEP) The Apollo 17 mission was flown in December 1972, that
would be after the Object crossed down May 25th 1972 if I'm right
about this date. The stations ran from deployment until they were
turned off on September 30th 1977. This means that there were four
Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Packages deployed and operating at
the time the Object I saw crossed in front of the Moon.
To suggest an alternative explanation for the cause of the signal interruption other than the Object I saw eclipsing the Moon is to try to put forward an explanation that would be impossible to prove. I saw the Object. I know what happened. When the scientist quoted in the magazine article were I first read about nasa losing their lunar telemetry stated, "whatever caused the signal interruption, it had to have been enormous," he knew that there was only one explanation that fit and that was that obviously some type of an object had to have blocked the signals causing the interruption. As it turns out I can say with 100% certainty that he was right. That's exactly what happened. He wasn't the only one who knew either. Also for some time I have wondered what the last signals they received from the Moon at that time indicated? For example I have read that the seismic detector experiments that were deployed worked very well with a high degree of sensitivity. I would like to know what the reacquired signals indicated. Were there any unusual seismic readings recorded right before and right after the signal interruption? After finding out that the Object's basic flight path is oriented basically exactly the same as the newly discovered lemon shaped moon's long axis, I now know for a fact that the Object's forces impact the Moon. There was progress towards NEO study and detection starting in the 1970's. They knew something big went by right under their noses and it seems they missed it. Even though they didn't see it they did detect the Object's crossing.
When it comes to this subject the problem is we think we know what the ancient people were talking about and writing about and thinking and we don't. There's no notion or concept today that could conceive of or imagine or consider the facts of the reality of the Changed and Lasting from the Moon and the background of space and then also consider and realize that the crossing Object eclipsing the Moon and intercepting and slowing down the light from the Moon could be real and the cause of the entire Lasting Light event.
what I just wrote makes little sense to many. My poor writing skills
aside I am writing about an astronomical body that I clearly saw with
a telescope when I was a boy. I am writing in english. The problem
for people is not understanding what I'm saying, the problem for people
or readers is they don't know what I'm talking about. The speeding
forward rolling Object I saw certainly does not behave at all like
any other type of planet but I am talking about an object that is
certainly small planet sized especially if we are debating Pluto's
status as a planet. Certainly I know that this completely different
and bizarre looking and behaving astronomical Object is no were close
to being a planet the way we think of planets today. On The
Formation Of The Moon page I wonder about the possibility that
the Object is the remaining core of the theorized planet Theia. It
may also be true that the Object is a captured object around the sun
and it didn't form around our sun the way the other planets formed.
I am suggesting this because of the Object's retrograde orbit. It's
a complicated situation when today we try to understand what is written
down in ancient times regarding the Object. Today people can't picture
or imagine the type of orbital behavior that the crossing Object exhibits.
Another problem for readers today's is that often times when the Object
is mentioned in ancient texts the Changed and Lasting Light event
that the Object causes to happen with the light from the Moon is also
written about and this causes much confusion and is a primary reason
why the experts today can so easily discredit the ancient descriptions
as being to fantastic and impossible therefore not true. This last
point is a very major reason why most people today can't take ancient
descriptions of the Object seriously.
Here's part of the problem for people trying to understand from me or trying to figure things out for themselves. The forward rolling Object travels at a tremendous speed as it accelerates towards the sun as a part of it's very long highly eccentric retrograde orbit. It crosses between the Moon and the Earth in just a few short minutes. I estimate the Object would travel the distance of Pluto's average distance from the sun in roughly 30 days or less. 46 years does give the Object lots of time to slow down and I assume that it naturally starts to decelerate as soon as it passes it's perihelion point with the sun as it passes by beside and below the sun. Maybe the Object is at perihelion when it is between the Moon and the Earth? The incredible speeding Object will only give minimal warning maybe only a matter of weeks once it's closer than Pluto as it travels down towards it's crossing point between the Earth and the Moon. A new point of light that brightens as the fast mover approaches us.
I once read somewhere in an ancient text that it sounded like you could see the returning Object either from one hour before sunset or from one hour before it crosses down through between the Moon and the Earth I couldn't tell which one. Either that or the light the Object reflects is seem for a longer period of time before it reaches to within the distance of the Moon's orbit maybe days or a week or two who knows?
way certainly the speeding brilliantly shining very reflect Object's
probably highly metallic surface should definitely allow for the Object
to be seen for at least a short time before it gets here unless somehow
the mysterious frame dragging effect somehow complicates the situation
as far as directly viewing the Object is concerned. The suddenly visible
new light in the sky from the Object may be visible for a fair number
of nights preceding it's arrival. The Object should hopefully take
at least a full month to reach us from the equivalent distance of
Pluto's average orbital distance from the sun. If you knew where to
look for the first appearance of the Object's reflected sunlight you
would hopefully be able to see it appear. The opposite situation to
this again is the speeding massive forward rolling Object with it's
Standing Stone Crater numbered in the hundreds at the very least,
does effect the behavior of light. This said instead of the Object
hiding or cloaking itself somehow when I first saw the moon coloured
Object a number of seconds before the Changed and Lasting event occurred
it looked exactly like you would expect a astronomical object to look
without any light blending or mixing and changing going on the way
things happen seconds later with the start of the Moon's Changed and
Lasting Light event. The Object's colour matches exactly with the
colour of our Moon's bright surface area. I have this worry probably
unfounded, that somehow the Object may wrap itself with the blackness
and the light from the background of space as it approaches the Earth
the same way that it seemingly wraps itself up with the light from
the Moon around it's upper right horizon during stage two or the second
phase of the Changed Light event when the solid light rises. Einstein's
rotational frame dragging effect may be at work on a grand scale.
I have to wonder about this question because I know that although
space looks black it is in fact full of background sources of light
and energy. Will the Object be visible while it travels through the
inner solar system towards us before it arrives in front of the Moon
where I know for a fact that it's clearly visible? I hope so and it
probably will be visible returning down towards us and these speculations
will probably prove to be just that speculations that don't add up
to what really happens. My view of the Object started after the Moon
was fully eclipsed a few short seconds before the Moon's Changed Light
emerges to the right of the Object. So I didn't see what the Object
looked like before it actually arrived in front of the Moon so I have
to guess about what the Object looks like as it approaches the Earth.
I did see how it's powerful forces change the way the Moon's light
looks and behaves so I am left having to wonder about how the Object's
forces may effect how the Object looks to the naked eye or to big
telescopes as it approaches. Maybe a large light source like the Moon
might be what's required behind the Object in order for a any sort
of Changed Light event to be triggered or maybe not.
Object's orbital time period may be 46 Years and 1 day long if I am
right and I might not be. There may be some sort of larger overall
cycle or pattern it follows but I can only guess. That may possibly
involve long time spans like 3600 years and this may account for why
the researchers following ancient clues are suggesting that 3600 yrs
is important and related to a returning celestial object. On the other
hand a 3600 year time frame for some sort of larger orbital cycle
could be completely in error like so many other interpretations of
Planet nine researchers have detected the gravitational effects of the Object I saw between the Moon and the Earth. That's what I think has finally happened. This news was a great relief for me because I know that they are finally closing in on the Object and hopefully they will discover it soon.
One unfortunate result of this is that there are many very dedicated very hard working sincere people out there trying to understand about the celestial object they really sense the ancient people were talking about. Many people are trying to figure this out and there is actually something to figure out. One does not want this majority of people I believe, to be all painted with the same brush as those who truly are trying to create and sell something. Some people out and out make things up in order to try to propel themselves and their book sales etc. Opposite to this many other people are trying to figure it out and a most respectful thank you and hats off to them from me. One could easily argue that you all are right because you all are right and you have been right all along. That's how it appears to me.
Later nasa and perhaps some others may well say that you people were all wrong because you were unable to actually describe the Object itself. Listen to the video, nasa scientist Dr. Morrison does not provide any real Object related information and neither does he describe anything at all that is actually describing the Object. Along with that he doesn't refute any of my descriptions of the Object for two basic reasons. The primary reason is because he doesn't know about the Object and the second reason is because he hasn't heard about my descriptions of what I saw happen when I saw the Object.
all of you together or nasa are able to describe the Object. Nasa
says there is no object or unknown member of the solar system about
to return. Many sincere researchers out there are convinced there
is a returning astronomical object of some type.
For a great many big important reasons this is an overall disturbing and unfortunate situation. I believe that obviously Dr. Morrison is honest and quite sincere. Unfortunately he does not appear to know anything at all about the Object that I saw. Is nasa actually really this unaware? Or do some people behind the scenes really know about the Object and what it does concerning the changing the light from the Moon? Scientists share information. If there are people at nasa or whatever other agency who know then I believe that certainly none of them should be thought of as being people of science because their lack of disclosure has hindered and cost the scientific community greatly as they struggle to understand many things without the benefit of knowing about what really happens in our own neighborhood in the solar system. I have to ask this question because it concerns me that maybe some people behind the scenes might know about the Object but choose to keep it hidden. I know this is a possibility but at the same time surly if there are people who know about the Object they would be already out there with the news of their discovery. Somehow at this point we have a situation were the Object is unknown to what appears to be basically everybody.
of the names that I use for the Object Of The Crossing Down is Adoil
along with Theia for example. I know for a fact that the name Adoil
was once used to identify the Object Of The Crossing Down. The Ancient
Object Of The Crossing Down is what I call the incredible astronomical
Object that I saw. Instead of a single word or name I decided to use
a descriptive phrase to name or describe the Ancient Object because
it seems natural to me. The Object has a certain basic obvious very
ancient look to it when you see it. Even as a young boy it was instantly
clear to me that the Object was a very old place. The very fast moving
forward rolling Object will be detected orbiting down towards us from
the depths of space again. Approximately thirty days or probably less
after it enters within the distance of Pluto's orbit the Object will
arrive down between the Moon and the Earth.
possible approximate orbital path down through the solar system for Theia.
This example orbit needs to be adjusted into a more elliptical shaped high eccentricity orbit.
Also my orbit example is not lined up very accurately and it needs to be rotated or tilted slightly
to the left in order to line up better with the perihelion region of space where the small bodies
out past Neptune are being effected by the Object as it orbits down through them.
Griffith Observatory Video, "Ninth Planet? - All Space Considered."
COPY & SAVE & PRINT & SHARE
Familiarize yourself with the details and the sequence of events that I describe.
Numbered 1-5 combined these five separate Return Viewer Guides
describe what a viewer sees actually happening when the speeding forward rolling
Ancient Celestial Object returns and crosses down in front of the Moon.
Even if you decide that you are not going to read anything else, if you read Return Viewer's Guide #1, you will know
the basic idea of what actually happens when the ancient Object returns & crosses down in front of the Moon.
Find in point form Return Viewer's Guide #1, approximately 20% of the way down the page;
Return Viewer's Guide For Use With Or Without A Small Backyard Telescope
print Out The 5_ReturnViewerGuides.pdf