The Crossing Down
In days to come you will have good use of this
such are the things you will see you who will come here.
Go to your right...
|Griffith Observatory Video, "Ninth Planet? - All Space Considered."|
Observatory Curator, Dr. Laura Danly
what for me is a very inspirational talk that
gives me more hope that the scientists are finally
about to discover the speeding forward rolling
Object that crosses down through between the Moon
and the Earth. This astronomical object is the
big missing piece of the puzzle and one way or
another sooner or later the speeding Object will
simply be back and it will be suddenly upon on
us after following it's retrograde orbital track
down through the solar system again. That is not
the best case scenario and hopefully that won't
happen instead hopefully the Object will be detected
with at least weeks to go before it gets back
instead of only having perhaps a few days warning
or maybe less who knows? Once the astronomers
finally know what's going on, the astronomers
and the media will need to spread the word that
the Object can orbit down across in front of the
Moon safely because this is a fact and people
will need to know this fact! I believe that this
is the important first order of business once
the speeding forward rolling returning Object
has been detected.
|Griffith observatory video screen capture 5:58 - 5:59|
These two images or maybe more like the image on the right may possibly be the view from the Object looking forward along it's curving to the right retrograde orbital path towards and then through the outer KBOs perihelion region towards the place in space were the Object crosses down through between the Moon and the Earth before it exits the bottom of the solar system again through the area of space beside and below the sun. In these two images when the Object travels past the sun it is located to the left of the sun and below the sun.
a fact that is a reality for me and I know for a fact
that it will be your reality soon too.
The Giant Impact Hypothesis: The physical theory for making the moon and its geochemical prediction not matching observations problem: The impactor remained intact. It looks to me like it was a giant hit and run impact event instead.
You will hear me talking on my old podcasts about how I thought that the Giant Impact Hypothesis was wrong and I thought that not because I realized it wasn't complete but because I thought the whole theory was impossible. Instead I had always believed that the Object, Moon and Earth accreted together which I now know makes no sense. I finally figured it out when it finally dawned on me that the obvious is the obvious and that the Object I saw has to be Theia.
The image to the right shows a possible approximate retrograde orbital path down through the solar system for Theia. This example orbit needs to be adjusted into a more elliptical elongated shaped high eccentricity orbit. I'm guessing that the Object orbits down into the inner solar system again through outer KBOs perihelion region that has been discovered. If this is correct then an orbital path from from the University of Michigan researcher's probable zone, the outer KBOs perihelion region of space and that place in space where the Object crosses down through between the Moon and the Earth. This might actually be an approximate sample snap shot of the Object's retrograde orbital path. The Object gets at least as close to the sun as the Earth and Moon. That crossing point between the Earth and the Moon could turn out to be the Object's perihelion point with the sun? I don't know but this may be a possibility. Or the perihelion of Theia's orbit may be down lower further past the Moon and the Earth below and beside the sun.
With the Object orbiting the sun so closely at perihelion, it's aphelion or furthest distance from the sun must be absolutely tremendous and I'm guessing that it may even be in the ecliptic plain region similar to the Object's possible perihelion point between the Earth and the Moon. I read somewhere in an ancient text about how the Object spends half of it's orbital course below the Earth. I don't know if the Object's perihelion and aphelion points are within the ecliptic or not but I can guess that they might be and to me at this point this feels right to me. Thanks to Planet Nine astronomers and researchers for the first time I have been able to possibly visualize what the Object's retrograde orbit might look like and where it orbits down into the solar system from above possibly through the outer Kuiper belt object's perihelion region before arriving down between the Moon and the Earth. So this is my best guess about what the Object's orbit looks like and how it might work.
It appears as if there's a lot about Theia and the formation of the Earth and Moon that science is right about and a lot that they don't know. It's amazing to me that they were able to guess correctly about any of this stuff namely and starting with the Giant Impact and they got it right. This has led the way for me to be able to realize that the Object I saw is Theia otherwise I would have no clue about this giant impact area of things and I would still be stuck without answers to many of the question I've always had. Past the point of the Giant Impact Theia simply remained intact and continues to travel through space to ultimately return to the point or place in space where the impact with the early Earth occurred orbiting between the impacted Earth and and the debris forming the early Moon and this orbit continues today. Their theory is off but when you think about it guessing about what happens next after the Giant Impact is going to be difficult. Also the highest odds were that Theia was going to be an astronomical body that accreted and formed out of the original protoplanetary disc the same way the Earth and the rest of the planets did. Who knew it was possible for such a tremendously bizarre astronomical object such as this to suddenly enter into the equation. From what I have read about the idea of some retrograde astronomical objects it appears to me as if the Object did not form within our solar system. Did the giant hit and run impact event with the early Earth cause the Object to become a captured object around the sun or was the Object already captures and orbiting the sun and did the early Earth just happen to eventually get in the way? I have a lot more questions and thoughts about this and eventually I will try to write a page about it in an effort to focus more on this important area.
The speeding forward rolling Object does arrive down from somewhere. Obviously I don't know the Object's exact retrograde orbital path other than it's path between the Moon and the Earth but thanks to the investigating Planet Nine scientists and astronomers who are definitely showing the the world the way here there is an opportunity to better understand the possible place in space where the Object of the Crossing down returns home from. I am more sure than ever that the very incredible fantastic massive speeding astronomical Object I saw crossing down through between the Moon and the Earth is the theorized Planet Nine. Because I didn't know what the Object was at the time without me realizing it years ago when I wrote the Return Viewer's Guide I was writing about how Theia returns. Again I had even heard about the giant impact hypothesis years ago but totally discounted the idea figuring that the Object must have formed with the Moon and Earth because all three bodies are so closely tied together a three body system. Then I discovered that retrograde objects in our solar system could not have originally formed in our solar system instead they formed somewhere else in space. The Object I saw has to have been captured around the sun early in the solar system's history. A giant hit and run impact event with the early Earth where clearly obviously the impactor remained intact. I just couldn't see the obvious for a long time even though it was staring me in the face. I finally realized that the Object I saw has to be theia. What else could it be?
University of Michigan researchers probable zone
may be the region of space
I watch an unfortunate situation where because the
Object is unknown planetary scientists who are trying
to understand the formation of the Moon and Earth
and the solar system are handicapped. Sooner or
later the scientists will also realize that the
impactor remained intact.
The Object travels at a tremendous speed through
between the Moon and the Earth in approximately
5 minutes give or take. Certainly the Object takes
less than ten minutes to travel this distance.
I used to think it was more like 2-3 minutes but
I have at least partially reconsidered and it
may actually take up to 5 and even 5 1/2 minutes
to travel this distance considering that the crossing
angle itself adds distance and time. Could the
Object take as long as 6 minutes and a couple
seconds to cross through? I have to say maybe
because that may actually be the case however
less likely 6 minutes or slightly more seems to
me. Writing this page caused me to realize that
the Object's crossing time could be at least slightly
longer than 2-3 minutes.
The Object's top to bottom sink rate of motion is approximately one half of the Object's left to right crossing rate of motion as seen from the Earth.
The Object's forward roll rate is difficult to determine but I'm going to guess it's probably approximately one forward roll per 45 - 65 seconds. Similar to when I'm trying to guess how long it takes for the Object to travel the distance between the Moon and the Earth my guesses concerning the Object's forward roll rate also vary slightly and you will find examples of this throughout all of my writing.
Illustrating the forward rolling crossing Object's orbital path down through between the Moon and the Earth with 100% accuracy is not possible. However in general with a very slight adjustment, The Basic Flight Path image is exactly what the forward rolling Object's orbital crossing angle looks like. Unfortunately there's no way that I know of that would allow me to properly illustrate the Object's incredible speed. Take the Indiana Jones boulder and slow it down and look at it directly in the middle from close up and that does simulate the effect you see when you see the Object however a big difference is that the Object is the size of a small planet and that does have a profound effect on the perspective that viewer has especially when using a small back yard telescope the way I saw the Object.
Adjustment: The left to right crossing angle and the top to bottom sink rate shown might be slightly high. Slightly reduce the left to right crossing angle. Also very slightly reduce the top to bottom sink rate angle and this may be a closer approximation than the angles across and down that are shown in my Basic Flight Path Image.
Observatory Video, "Ninth Planet? - All
A freakish planet."
the outer parts of our solar system."
Strangely enough when I saw the Object I noticed right away how the Object's forward roll rate actually looks like it closely matches it's forward movement against or in comparison with the stars in the background of space. Going back to those seconds as a boy who had never looked through a telescope before, when I was seeing the Object I instantly thought that there must be some sort of invisible ramp there that the Object was rolling down on because otherwise how could it stay up in space like that without anything holding it up because it should just be falling down instead of rolling down across on an angle. So in my young boy's mind's eye the only thing that made sense was that there must be an invisible ramp there for the Object to roll down on and at the time this made perfect sense to me at least for a while. The point I'm trying to make and the visual that I'm trying to convey is that when I saw the Object rolling down the overall scene did allow me or cause me to quickly imagine that the Object was rolling down on an invisible ramp. Somehow this visual effect looks natural although obviously the Object's forward roll rate is very slow compared to it's true speed forward along it's orbital path.
The Object's forward roll rate is difficult to determine but I'm going to guess it's probably approximately one forward roll per 45 - 65 seconds. Similar to when I'm trying to guess how long it takes for the Object to travel the distance between the Moon and the Earth my guesses concerning the Object's forward roll rate also vary slightly and you will find examples of this throughout all of my writing.
"doom for Earth and in fact that is not
going to happen."
My descriptions of the Moon's Changed Light are as accurate as my descriptions of the Object itself however it won't be until other people see the Changed Light for themselves before there's any chance that anyone will or could possibly consider my descriptions of the Moon's Changed Light to be real, I understand this completely. I have said many times that If I was hearing about the Changed Light for the first time from someone talking or writing about it and I hadn't seen it for myself, it's simple there's no way that I would be even close to being able to consider the Return Viewer's Guide as being real or true. People do have a chance to see with foreknowledge if they decide to read the Return Viewer's guide found free on this website. I can say what I saw and I can say what happens and when I do I'm describing exactly what will be seen happening again within the Moon's Changed Light when thousands of massive tall crater rim pieces on the Object's surface cast shadows into the Changed Light from the Moon.
Unfortunately there is no guarantee that the Object
will always orbit down through between the Moon
and the Earth safely like it did the night that
I saw it, and it did possibly on the evening of
May 24, 1926 when there was a report about an astronomical
Object crossing down across the Moon's disc from
it's upper left corner towards it's lower right
corner. That's exactly what the Object that I saw
did and that occurred 3 nights before the full Moon
in 1926 which matches very closely with the night
that I saw the Object because that night the Moon
was very close to being a full Moon when we looked
at it but I don't actually know for a fact that
it was three night before the full Moon when I saw
the Object. But based on the 1926 report I am guessing
that I saw the Object three nights before the full
Moon as well. When you look at my basic flight path
image for the Object it's easy to see how the Object
crossing down three nights before the full Moon
fits and makes sense were as if the Object was to
cross down with the Moon full for example three
nights later, the space left for the Object's orbital
path is greatly reduced.
If Dr. Danly knew this I know that she would not have said, " doom for Earth and in fact that is not going to happen," because unfortunately just like me, she wouldn't be able to say for sure what's going to happen when the Object gets back home again.
24, 1926 there were 17 days
until the Moon was at perigee. May 25, 1972 when
I think I may have seen the Object there were 13
days until the Moon was at perigee.
May 26, 2018
is the night that I think the Object may be back
and that night is 9 days
before the Moon is at perigee. Again after another
46 years and 1 day, the Object might be back crossing
down between the Moon and the Earth on the evening
of May 27, 2064.
1:53 ...it's showing the orbits of a
Does this suggest that the perihelion, that place in space that Griffith Observatory Curator, Dr. Laura Danly is referring to might be the actual place or area in space where the Object orbits down from or through? I'm going to guess that it is because of the very precise nature of the evidence that has been gathered by the scientists. Plus I saw the Object so I know that it orbits down from somewhere and the perihelion region looks like a very good possibility.
This is probably actually a major clue as to where to conduct the difficult task of looking for the speeding Object against the background of space as it rolls down towards us. The Object's surface is brilliantly reflective so when it becomes visible reflecting the sun's light back towards us while it is still at a great distance it will gradually become brighter as it nears the Moon and the Earth. The Object is so bright that from the point when I was first initially stepping forward towards the telescope again to bend over and look at the Moon again I could see that the telescope's eyepiece was completely brightly lit up inside and I actually thought that a light had been switched on inside the telescope. You have to remember that I was probably only 12 at the time and this was my first time looking through a telescope and I might have only seen the Moon clearly once before possibly on my second turn I might have seen the Object I'm not sure exactly but it's way more than fair to say that I didn't know anything about the details of how a small back yard telescope worked. Through the lens before my eye was lined up perfectly to look at what I thought was going to be the Moon again I was seeing the inside of the telescope brightly lit up and I was easily noticing how it was constructed inside and all screwed together. Then I saw the Object and instantly I was very surprised by how extremely bright it was in comparison to the Moon. At the same time I was wondering about it's brightness hurting my eye I was also realizing that although the Object is very bright it was easy to look at from very close up through the telescope. On the brightness scale for celestial objects I don't know how bright the Object is but as far as anything that you can normally expect to see from the Earth aside from the sun, the Object is going to easily be the brightest. The view of the Object through my friend Mike's Tasco 3" achromat small backyard telescope was stunningly crystal clear compared the the Moon. Mike's dad removed the higher power eye piece and replaced it with a probably the lowest power eye piece and then focused the telescope on the Moon for us. So basically I have said that in general at least, a normal in focus view of the Moon should give the viewer a spectacular very clear in focus look at the Object and ultimately especially the Moon's Changed and Lasting Light. The small Tasco telescope we were using could also be used as a spotting scope terrestrially because it displays the image upright in the eye piece As it turns out future viewer's who intend to use a telescope to view the Object between the Moon and the Earth while it is changing the light from the Moon really do need to use a spotting style telescope or binoculars or the naked eye because seeing the sights upright and not upside down is very important. It is my understanding that most or all amateur telescopes display the image upside down in the eye piece. Seeing the Object at such a close position and seeing the sights and things that happen in the Moon's Changed Light upright the way those sights were meant to be seen is a main priority for the viewer. I would not want be see the heart of the Changed Light upside down.
Again because the Object is moving towards us maybe it will be detected suddenly like a new point of light that grows in brightness. I am guessing that while the Object is still at an extreme distance there should be at least some slight detectable movement against the background of stars but I don't know. If the Object is already visible within the range of Earth telescopes then we need to be looking for a known point of light that is gradually increasing in brightness. Except for some possible slight movement the Object is probably not moving much against the background of space the way a normal orbiting planet or outer body in the solar system does so the Object may not be detectable using the traditional search method. The Object's ability to very efficiently reflect light might help in the search for it's detection. The Object's extreme speed means that it will arrive back to it's crossing point very shortly after it is first detected.
As a starting point calculate the positions of the Earth and the Moon and the solar system and the location of the perihelion region of space on the three dates that I suggest then if necessary move on to other dates because my dates might be incorrect. These dates might be dates when the Object crosses down between the Moon and the Earth. May 24, 1926, and May 25th, 1972 and May 26, 2018. There are 46 years and one day between those dates. Using those dates and the positions of the Moon and Earth on those dates and then using my basic flightpath image have a look a see if this points anywhere close to the location of the perihelion's position in space.
either will or won't be a correlation between my
basic flightpath image and the perihelion region
of space. If there is no correlation found that
would indicate that the Object orbits down through
this region of space then this would mean that the
Object orbits down from somewhere else. The only
facts that I know for sure for myself are the facts
I know because of seeing the Object. This whole
Planet 9 and Planet 10 business has got my hopes
up that finally evidence of the Object's presence
along it's orbital path has finally been found.
It really is critically important that the Object
is detected with as much warning as possible before
it gets here.
Former asteroid 2013 UQ4, now Comet C/2013 UQ4 has a retrograde orbit that looks like it could be a miniature mirror image of the Object's retrograde orbit. I am going to suggest that astronomers should check to see if there is any correlation between the area in space where the orbits of 2013 UQ4, 2013 US10, and 2013 UP8 seem to intersect. And the the outer object's perihelion area in space and my basic orbital flight path image for the Object on the dates that I suggest and other dates as well. May 24, 1926, May 25, 1972, May 25, 2018 and May 26, 2064 when the Moon is at perigee. Could this more clearly define and illuminate the Object's retrograde orbital track down through the solar system towards the place in space where it crosses down through between the Moon and the Earth? Maybe this might be an alignment that would help to enable people to be able to realize that the Object I describe does exist and it might be the cause of the disturbance in the outer body perihelion region and it might also cause C/2013 UQ4 to have the retrograde orbit it displays.
The other end of what I imagine to be an extremely elongated orbit the Object must be crossing back up through the orbital plain at an extremely slow speed at an extreme distance from the sun. Above on this page I try to guesstimate the Object's speed by trying to guess how long it takes for the Object to travel the distance between the Moon and the Earth. My guesses and my shaky math are all over the place but it is easily safe to say that the Object travels between the Moon and the Earth at a speed that ranges from 2 to 4 or more million miles an hour. For a long time I thought that there was no way it could have taken the Object more than 3 minutes to travel that distance and I really felt that it was probably more like 2 1/2 or even just 2 minutes and who knows these early guesses might turn out to be more accurate than my supposedly more thought out and reasoned guesses that sees the Object take as long as maybe 5 1/2 minutes to travel this distance. So basically today when I say that the Object is traveling at a speed of at least 2+ million miles an hour I know that this is a very conservative estimate and that the Object is probably actually moving much faster than this.
If or unless the Object falls into a separate category of astronomical object because of it's extreme speed and obvious very dense massive nature it seems to me that the Object has to follow the solar system's overall average escape velocity speed limit in order to remain in orbit around the solar system's central mass which the Object obviously does do. With the Object's orbital point closest to the sun at a position that is so stunningly close to the sun while the Object is traveling at such an extremely high rate of speed, what does this suggest about what the Object's entire orbit look like? Understanding the Object's orbit is a starting point and it's the same important starting point that humans have always focused on going back into prehistoric times because of the importance of knowing exactly when the Object will be back. If you are reading this and you are a concerned scientist then it turns out that soon it will be your job to try and figure this all out. Will it turn out that the Object's mass and speed and incredible long orbit will all add up to being the secret to the regularity of the solar system? I have always thought of the Object as a type of giant counter rotating flywheel for the solar system because of it's retrograde orbit around the sun in an opposite direction compared to the Earth and the planet's orbit around the sun. My gut feeling is that the Object is somehow the glue that holds everything together stretching and torquing the solar system causing everything to work in synchronicity.
"something has to keep pumping them in that place"
Dr. Laura Danly is verbally describing the gravitation effects and disturbances on the comet like objects that are linked with the perihelion region that the recent discoveries and evidence has brought to light. I looks to me like it's the Object that's doing the gravitational pumping action that she describes. She is interpreting the effect as a pumping effect "in that place." That place is probably a spot along the Object's orbital path back down into the inner solar system that has been illuminated because of the gravitation effects and disturbances that the Object caused and continues to cause when it goes down through the perihelion region of space in between those object's Dr. Danly is referring too. My best guess is that every forty six years and one day the Object goes speeding down through the perihelion bulls eye towards the Moon and the Earth. I'm saying that the Object travels down towards and then into the plain of the solar system and then down towards Earth because that's what it must have been doing before I saw it crossing down through between the Moon and the Earth. That's what I'm basing my statement on. The scientists have their evidence and I saw the Object so when I put the two together I am sure there is a very high chance that the Object orbits down through the perihelion region of space just before it returns to cross down through between the Moon and the Earth. The scientists seem to have their Planet 9 and Planet 10 orbiting in the correct orbital plain but the don't understand that the Object has a very long very high eccentricity retrograde orbit and they obviously can't imagine that the Object is actually Theia and that it has continued to cross down through between the Moon and the Earth since the time of the Giant Impact.
times the earth's mass"
The Planet 9 Theory describes a large astronomical object at a great distance orbiting counter clockwise in a prograde direction around the sun the same way that the eight major planets and the majority of the rest of the objects in the solar system orbit the sun. So based on this great distance they calculate that the object they are searching for must have a mass ten times greater than the Earth's mass. Since the actual Object itself might orbit down through the outer perihelion region of space towards the Earth, the Object comes into much closer proximity or you could say very close or maybe practically direct proximity to the disturbed objects that also orbit back to the perihelion region in space so although tremendously massive the Object is probably has less than ten times the Earth's mass. I am guessing that this must be the case because the gravitational effects that have been observed and were used in the theory that suggests Planet 9 must be ten times the Earth's mass is based on the idea that the Object is far away at a tremendous distance from the perihelion region. I'm guessing the reason for this line of thought is because they are thinking that they should have seen Planet 9 already so since they haven't and they know that their evidence is real they are theorizing a big planet that's so far away it hasn't been discovered yet must be responsible the the gravitational effects in the perihelion region. Really when I think about it and when you look back from the future today that's the only scenario that should or could make sense to the scientists or anyone else who doesn't already know about the Object. As far as I can tell the astronomers are not thinking about the type of object I saw or it's orbital behavior otherwise they would have considered it in their Planet 9 Theory. The Planet 10 researchers have somehow figured out that the mass required to cause the gravitational effects that have been discovered in the perihelion region is less than ten times the Earth's mass. So Planet 10 is thought to be smaller and closer to the sun than planet 9. You have to ask what else are they to think? They see the direct evidence but they don't know about the Object. If I hadn't seen the Object I'm sure that I would also conclude that the perturbing object can't be seen and yet we know it's there, therefore it must be something big and far away. This is a logical conclusion. Could an astronomical object the approximately the size of the Moon, with ten times the Mass of the Earth travel through between the Earth and the Moon virtually unnoticed? If such a thing is possible then it may be possible that the Object is ten times more massive than the Earth.
We'll see what is discovered when the Object is detected. One thing that will be clear to the scientists sooner or later or instantly once the Object is discovered and that is that although the Object is only approximately the size of the Moon, for it's size it is a tremendously massive place. One fact that does say something about the Object's true nature is the fact that the Object is massive and powerful enough to drastically change the way that the Moon's light looks and behaves. Years ago my dad suggested to me that this must be a type of bent light occurrence just on a small scale compared to bent light from distant stars and galaxies, I think that he may be right at least partially. A local space historian made the strong point to me that basically in order for an object to effect the way light behaves it would have to have at least the size and mass of a large star. Clearly there isn't enough room between the Moon and the Earth for something that big so unfortunately he didn't have a chance to begin to consider this aspect of the Object. I saw an object that was either slightly bigger or slightly smaller than the Moon and it easily changed the way the light from the Moon looked and behaved. This is a fact and beyond this there's much more but at a very basic level the Object's powerful forces definitely do change the light from the Moon.
frame dragging is predicted by Einstein as a part
of his Theory of Relativity. I am mentioning this
because the rotational frame dragging component
of the Theory of Relativity requires a large rotating
massive object and that's exactly what I saw. Rotational
frame dragging might be a powerful force close to
the Object's surface and within the Moon's Changed
Light. The size and great mass and incredible speed
of the forward rolling Object combined with the
Moon's light as a background causes the Moon's light
to become changed in many drastic and unbelievable
ways as seen from the Earth. I believe that observers
on the Earth can expect to see an example of what
rotational frame dragging looks like on a very large
scale at the point, from the point in time when
the Changed Light event has entered it's second
phase instantly after the inward pulsing effect
transition period between the Valley Phase and the
Rising Light Mountain Phase is over. Moving towards
the Earth from over the Object's upper right horizon
hugging the Object's surface you will see light
from the Moon looking like a series of thick shimmering
glistening one way moving areas of Changed Light
that look like a big waves washing up on a very
large beach. Unlike water waves these waves of light
only go in one direction one following another and
each repeating the one way movement that looks like
a wave washing up on a beach. As usual the Changed
Light continues to behave in the most unusual bizarre
ways. As each wave of light finishes arriving from
over the Object's upper right horizon, it joins
in and becomes the next smooth and solid looking
layer or base section at the base of what is now
a rapidly smoothly rising huge curved column of
solid Changed and Lasting Light from the Moon and
the background of space. Check the Return Viewer's
Guide for more details. This is the point when I
think that a viewer who is looking for the rotational
frame dragging effect will be able to realize that
they might actually be watching the fantastic spectacular
rotational frame dragging effect in action on an
incredibly large scale. That's my guess at least.
This is something to keep in mind for those like
me who wonder about all of the mysteries of light
and especially the mysteries and effects of the
very special Changed and Lasting Light from the
Moon and the background of space.
even though I'm guessing that the Object's mass
is probably not ten times the mass of the Earth
it is still very massive and obviously very powerful.
Going back to the beginning, like a cannon ball
through a water melon the Object of the Crossing
down, Theia was powerful enough to blast it's way
through the early Earth and then just keep going
continuing to clear debris from it's orbital path.
In spite of it's small size this very intimidating
spectacular speeding astronomical Object must be
a very powerful force in the solar system. I'm going
to stick my neck out a little bit here and suggest
that for it's size, mass and speed and combined
powerful forces we know of no other type of astronomical
object that compares to this object and if we do
we certainly have not observed this type of object
closely enough to detect any details. If science
had already done so then everyone would already
know that a standing stone circle on the Earth is
a copy or model of a crater on this type of astronomical
object's surface. Again this speaks to the nature
of the Object and it's composition The vertical
crater rim pieces look like they were probably originally
surface crust that was basted upwards into their
present positions today. The rim pieces are bent
upwards at their bases. If the Object had a rocky
surface crust the crater rim piece base areas would
have fractured and broken and there would be no
vertically standing crater rim pieces. For me this
evidence and other surface details as well cause
me to suspect that the surface of the Object may
be highly metallic in nature. This does speak to
the Object's possible mass. How massive would the
Moon be if it's surface was metallic with denser
material in it's core? I don't know, the Object
is slightly bigger or slightly smaller than the
Every now and then over the years I have tried to imagine what it will be like when suddenly there will be press conferences around the world galore 24/7 with the scientists and astronomers trying to describe the Object and what is happening all the while trying to keep themselves calm and everybody else calm. Maybe this is the sort of event that we all imagine we might be ready for however I don't believe that what actually happens is even close to what anyone today could possibly imagine. The sudden clear and obvious peril that the world is always in will be suddenly finally clear to everyone, welcome to my world, I totally get it.
The scientists think that they are looking for a typical type of planet, one that they are able to imagine and I have to give them credit they are pretty good at imagining what different types of planets might be like before they see them although I guess time will tell how close those guesses are but we have to start somewhere and the people today that are in the positions to be able to make these guesses and predictions are doing so with the best evidence that is available. That evidence seems strong and sound and they are gathering more evidence all the time. There will guesses that turn out to be correct and there will always be guesses that don't turn out to be correct and I know that only to well for myself. I think that it is amazing that we humans are able to do the sort of work and research in space that we do. My hat is off to the leading edge scientists and astronomers both professional and amateur alike. The bits of their work and information that I have managed to find and stumble into online have helped me a great deal as I struggle basically, to understand more about the Object I saw. I wish I knew more about what they know. To be honest since I saw the Object through my life gradually more and more I have realized that not only do I wish that I had realized what was going on with the Object sooner but also that I had also tried really hard when I saw young to become an astronomer. A big part of the problem wasn't just my marks in math but I grew up thinking that the astronomers knew all about the Object so I naturally figured that I had nothing to bring to the table as they say. I was wrong and by the time I clearly realized this fact I was finishing high school going out west to Calgary to get a job leaving no time to think about the job I wished I had instead. If I had become an astronomer or an amateur astronomer early in my life then I could have known more and ultimately done more about the Object and putting it out there so that people would be in a better position to know what's going on when the moment arrives when the Object is actually suddenly detected orbiting home towards us again.
When the astronomers detect the Object obviously suddenly everyone will know about the Object because the astronomers are really good at sharing information among each other and that will be the start of it and then after that the news of the Object will spread around the world fast. At first they might not realize that the Object is moving rapidly in our direction or somehow it may be possible that it is very obvious to them that the Object is moving rapidly nearly directly towards us. As the situation becomes increasingly clear the astronomers are going to begin to try to figure out and describe the Object as it rapidly approaches. Usually the scientific community has all the time that they need to work on most questions that they ask themselves or that they are faced with. This situation will be very different with astronomers having to deal with an urgent situation.
With the Object's very large raised surface mound area feature coming into view up from behind the Object over the top or equator area towards the Earth over and over again as the Object's forward rolling motion continues what will that look like from the Earth? Does the Object generate any radio frequencies that might fluctuate corresponding to it's forward roll rate of approximately one forward roll or revolution every 45 - 65 seconds. Are there any known radio object's out there that exhibit this characteristic? The extremely reflective surface of the Object should be seen at a great distance. Along with the brightness of the Object gradually increasing, will the level of the Object's growing brightness also fluctuate similar to possible radio frequency fluctuations. The overall frontal area of the Object facing towards the sun will increase when the raised mound area is at the top reflecting more total light towards the Earth and then the reflected light level will dip as the mound travels forward becoming an overhang before it goes down around the bottom of the Object again to then repeat as it rolls towards us.
What will the strong rotational frame dragging effect cause the speeding Object to look like as it rolls towards us with many many sources of light behind the Object in space for it to change the same way it changes the light from the Moon? I used to imagine that the Object might pull the blackness of space up around itself the way it blends with the light from the Moon and become practically invisible as it approached. Surly I am wrong about that but who knows what the Object is capable of and what it looks like as it approaches it's crossing point between the Earth and the Moon from such a great distance? When I saw first saw the Object it was before the incredible fantastic Changed and Lasting Light event had started and the only thing that I saw that was unusual was the Object itself. There were no weird strange changed light effects happening at this point but the comparison between what the Object looks like in front of the eclipsed Moon right before the Changed Light Valley is first seen to the right of the eclipsing Object and what the Object looks like when it is approaching the Earth from a great distance may or may not be equal or equivalent or a fair comparison. It could turn out that the Object looks exactly the same when it is arriving back down from deep space compared to what it looked like between the Moon when I first saw it. I am wondering if the Object will be changing the appearance and the behavior of the light from the background of space as it approaches the Earth the same way that it changes the light from the Moon and the background of space when it is crossing down in front of the Moon. This may be possible in fact I know I could be wrong but after seeing the powerful effect the Object has on light I feel as though it is only natural for the Object to be causing this effect for the viewer whenever a vewer is looking to the right of the Object and or especially whenever a viewer is looking over the Object's upper right horizon at whatever light sources happen to be present behind and closely arrayed around the Object's rapidly changing position. Maybe a large light source like the Moon is necessary and the light from stars and the background of space alone is not enough to trigger even a small scale Changed Light event. I know these speculations sound completely improbable but I am guessing based on what I saw. I can go on and on about this and I do.
What are the challenges that will be faced by the astronomers and scientists from the point in time when the Object is first detected rolling down towards us up until it actually arrives back down between the Earth and the Moon? I don't fully know but there will be many difficult challenges to be faced however remembering that the Object can cross down safely is the key most important first point that has to be remembered and shared with people. This will allow everyone to be able to hopefully keep calm while we try to figure out what type of astronomical object this actually is as the Object rapidly approaches before it finally arrives back down in front of the Moon where the fantastic ancient light blending and changing will begin as the Object seems to settle into place in front of the Moon as the Changed Light spreads the Object open deep and wide as the Object becomes "undone," as one ancient person wrote. I fully agree and I feel that using the word undone does somehow work and it describes the overall effect that happens to the appearance of the light that the Object is directly reflecting from the Object's surface towards the viewer, undone makes sense to me. This and other strange effects caused by the Object's large forward rolling mass and great speed towards the viewer means that the light observers are seeing being reflected towards the Earth from the Object's surface may potentially be changed and slightly unrecognizable or even completely unrecognizable. This is a possibility and if these rotational frame dragging effects are manifesting themselves then this could add to the difficulty level for astronomers who are trying to observe the Object.
When it comes to planet 9 and Planet 10 theories they may be correct and astronomical Object the scientists are looking for may exist. If they are incorrect about the Object being whatever type of planet they imagine in whatever type of orbit they imagine and it turns out that the Object I saw is the object they are searching for as I suspect it is it won't matter because they will have detected the Object and at that point everything that suddenly doesn't matter will be forgotten. At that point they will be seeing the Object and then finally the very real very serious business of what's the most important thing in space for us humans to know about will finally begin again after a very long time. Us humans have somehow forgotten the details about the Object and the Moon's Changed Light and what really actually happens and even where that special event happens. I think of the world's present unfortunate situation as being the high tech dark ages of today.
it is clearly a planet it has cleared
huge factor that will probably help to explain the
orbits of the small outer bodies in question is
the Object's tremendous speed as it travels down
through the perihelion region between these small
outer bodies. The fact that some of these small
outer bodies are orbiting in opposite directions
can probably be explained by the Object's orbital
track through between them. The Object's powerful
forces combined with it's tremendous speed as it
rolls forward along it's retrograde orbital path
between or through these objects is probably exactly
what has flung all of these small objects about
as Dr. Laura Danly describes.
With the Object's motion traveling toward the Earth in the inner solar system it may be very difficult to detect because of it's potential minimal movement relative to the stars in the background of space. I'm very worried that somehow astronomers are looking and searching in the wrong place in space for the Object. The scientists seem to feel as though Planet 9 has a 15,000 year orbit and there may be such an object with such an orbit. I know for a fact that the orbit being described by the astronomers does not match the orbit of the Object that I saw. The Object I saw most definitely has cleared it's orbit that is true and a part of that clearing of it's orbit happened or happens when it probably travels straight through the perihelion region towards the Earth. The astronomers do seem to be looking into space based on the gravitational evidence that they are sure is solid so you would think that this would mean that they are looking in the correct area and facing in the right direction. So does this mean that I should rest assured that they are looking in the right place in space and they are going to detect the Object with plenty of time before it gets here? Lets just say that I think it's probably an outside chance that they are looking in the exact right place in space and this because they aren't theorizing the correct type of retrograde orbit. I know that the place in space where they should be looking is fairly low in the sky more or less directly in line with the Object's 6° to 8° downward crossing angle orbital path down through between the Moon and the Earth. In a video I saw astronomer Mr. Mike Brown pointing up towards a search area that just seems like it's to high up in the sky. Maybe we are both pointing towards the same place in space I don't know for sure. If Mr. Brown is looking in the right direction based on the gravitation evidence and he probably is then I hope that he's looking at the perihelion region because I'm going to suggest that that's probably the place in space where the Object will be seen arriving back down from deep space as enters into the inner solar system again ready to orbit down through between the Moon and the Earth again right before it once again exits the bottom of the solar system beside and below the sun to repeat it's long fantastic extremely elongated very long retrograde orbital course.
The Object's extremely elongated retrograde orbit must be billions of miles long. The Object dives back towards the sun crossing between the Moon and the Earth traveling at an easy 2 million plus miles an hour on it's way towards deep space as it exits below the solar system. The astronomers are just not thinking about an orbit like the Object I saw has but they are very likely looking at the gravitational disturbances caused by the Object I saw. Hopefully the evidence and the complicated math with some old fashion good luck thrown in does end up leading the astronomers to detecting the Object at the earliest possible moment.
The planet Neptune was mathematically predicted before it was directly observed. With a prediction by Urbain Le Verrier, telescopic observations confirming the existence of a major planet were made on the night of September 23–24, 1846. Could today's calculations lead directly to the detection of the returning Object even though the Object has a difference orbit compared to what the astronomers predict in their equations? I hope so but it's clear that there is a lot going on with the Object and again I am worried the the main search area for planet 9 and Planet 10 is not where the Object is orbiting down from.
I hope I'm wrong about this and instead they are looking and searching in the right place. Sooner or later the Object will be detected. I know it's very important to detect the returning Object as long as possible before it actually gets back. One reason I say this is because this will give the scientists and media a chance to make it clear that the last two times the Object returned and crossed down in front of the Moon it did so safely. People knowing for a fact that the Object can cross down between the Earth and the Moon without causing destruction and death is obviously very important for many many reasons.This fact will not be obvious or known at first. It is important that the scientists find out about the speeding Object sooner rather than later. Basic fundamental fear will start to happen and spread and panic might start to happen.
Avoiding some sort of world wide panic is important and would help a lot of people and prevent many of the problems that unchecked panic would cause. I understand the fear part about knowing about the Object's presence and this unavoidable natural fear will instantly grip everyone who is aware of the Object. For me this fear runs very deep however one of the things that helps me is I think back and remember the solid unmoving ground where I stood that night while I was frozen looking in the telescope's eyepiece having expected to see the Moon again instead with the Moon completely eclipsed I was suddenly seeing the massive very intimidating Object filling the eye piece, seemingly rolling right at me! This is truly a completely shocking thing to see! The memory that there was no shaking coming from the ground while I saw the Object is the thing or basic thought that I think about when I feel my stress and worry getting to high. I remember that realizing that there was no shaking coming from the ground was one of the first thoughts that I had either during my view of the Object or right afterwards. For the first few years after seeing the Object I was just so relieved that it was gone that I didn't give it a lot of thought at first but by the time I was 15 years old or so 3 years later, I knew that it wasn't so simple and I began to understand that the very big scary place that I knew was coming back and the shocking magical thing that happens to the Moon's light was going to happen again! This is the time in my life when I started to think about the solid unmoving ground where I was standing when I saw the Object. For you reading this if you haven't seen the Object and the Moon's Changed Light yet then it will be hard for you to imagine the fear in the moment that will be there for a person watching as the Object is approaching them. For what seems like my whole life, knowing that the Object can cross down safely is the main thing that has helped to feel better about it so instead I live in a lower state of fear since and I'm able to feel calmer about knowing the Object will be back. I understand the importance of knowing that the Object can cross down safely! If everyone also knows this fact when the time arrives and the Object is nearly back then everyone has a chance to also feel better.
Unfortunately it's simple, when the people of the world discover the Object there will be an instant state of world wide fear that will be unavoidable. This is going to happen sooner or later. The fact that my descriptions of the Object itself along with its retrograde orbital path and extreme speed and forward rolling motion will be an exact match with the observations being made of the Object by astronomers will be solid proof that the Object really can cross down between the Moon and the Earth safely. This will be the critical information that needs to be disseminated around the world at that time in an effort to take some of the edge off the fear in the hopes that outright disastrous world wide panic can be avoided!
when the speeding Object is safely crossing down
in front of the Moon it's all about making sure
that people know to look towards the Object's upper
right horizon and to the right of the Object to
see the Moon's Changed and Lasting Light when it
suddenly emerges. It's not just the fantastic returning
Object of the Crossing Down Theia itself but instead
it's also the profoundly important primordial Changed
and Lasting Light event that the powerful Object
Theia causes to happen to the Moon's light changing
it and making it last and move and evolve in the
most incredibly fantastic stunning ways!
possible approximate orbital path down through the solar
system for Theia.
This example orbit needs to be adjusted into a more elliptical shaped high eccentricity orbit.
Also my orbit example is not lined up very accurately and it needs to be rotated or tilted slightly
to the left in order to line up better with the perihelion region of space where the small bodies
out past Neptune are being effected by the Object as it orbits down through them.
COPY & SAVE & PRINT & SHARE
Familiarize yourself with the details and the sequence of events that I describe.
Numbered 1-5 combined these five separate Return Viewer Guides
describe what a viewer sees actually happening when the speeding forward rolling
Ancient Celestial Object returns and crosses down in front of the Moon.
Even if you decide that you are not going to read anything else, if you read Return Viewer's Guide #1, you will know
the basic idea of what actually happens when the ancient Object returns & crosses down in front of the Moon.
Find in point form Return Viewer's Guide #1, approximately 20% of the way down the page;
Return Viewer's Guide For Use With Or Without A Small Backyard Telescope
print Out The 5_ReturnViewerGuides.pdf