The Crossing Down
In days to come you will have good use of this
such are the things you will see you who will come here.
Go to your right...
|The Speeding Forward Rolling Object's Magnetic Field|
I'm going to guess that the retrograde Object I saw and describe on this website has a magnetic field based on the reasons given for why the Earth and some other planets have magnetic fields. An astronomical object's speed and rate of rotation seem to be main factors related to that object's ability to generate a magnetic field. The Object I saw travels at a tremendous speed and it rolls forward at perhaps at rate of approximately one revolution or full complete full forward roll in it's direction of travel approximately every 45 - 65 seconds, so a minute give or take but perhaps just over a minute. Based on one roll per minute that's a roll rate that is approximately 1440/24hrs give or take a few hundred forward rolls either way. Compared to the rate that the known planets with magnetic fields revolve the Object's forward roll rate is so fast it potentially takes the dynamo theory mechanism to a completely different level.
"In physics, the dynamo theory proposes a mechanism by which a celestial body such as Earth or a star generates a magnetic field. The dynamo theory describes the process through which a rotating, convecting, and electrically conducting fluid can maintain a magnetic field over astronomical time scales. A dynamo is thought to be the source of the Earth's magnetic field, as well as the magnetic fields of other planets."
If this is the case then the incredible speeding forward rolling retrograde astronomical object that I describe may posses a core that functions with a dynamo effect that generates a magnetic field. In fact I am going to guess that the forward rolling Object's magnetic field will be measured and discovered to be extremely powerful and large well past what would be expected for a typical astronomical object of it's size. How big is the Object?
It seems clear to me that within the Object of the crossing down internal forces and pressures caused all of the bulging surface areas. These areas are bordered and defined and separated by the surface network of deep crease mark indentation lines. Like long deep canyons with random smaller shorter side canyons at right angles sloping upwards along both sides between the bugling surface regions these deep crease mark indentation line surface features will be key in understanding the entire Object itself and in particular the process that results in the creation and the locations of the Object's craters. The standing stone style craters are located within the bulging surface areas that are defined by the crease mark indentation lines in a random but even spread out network. I believe that extreme high pressure from beneath the surface burst through blasting the surface outwards causing the incredible craters with their towering vertically standing rim pieces. It seems very likely that what was originally the Object's surface layer or crust was blasted upwards and out towards space and now today remain in the form of the vertical rim pieces that neatly uniformly ring all of the circular craters. I saw no evidence of any crater anywhere on the surface area that I saw that looked like an impact crater the way we know and think of craters. The Object's craters are all exactly the same varying only in diameter with their vertical rim pieces correspondingly getting proportionally wider higher and more massive as the crater diameters increase.
There are no craters on the sides of the Object. The two opposing slightly flattish looking sides of the Object are the areas with the least amount of centrifugal force. Basically turning exactly like the hub of a wheel as opposed to the treaded part of a wheel. With the Object being slightly taller the way it rolls the craters are located in the areas of maximum centrifugal forces similar to the way that a tread pattern would be on a big off road tire with the tread reaching up the sidewall slightly towards the center hub of the wheel before ending entirely. Then in this next surface region there are bulging areas that transition between the craters and the side that did not develop craters. I believe that the crease mark lines are also present on the sides of the Object however there is no or minimal bulging within the crease mark lines in the side regions.
The only other area or region on the Object's surface that does not have any craters or crease mark indentation lines starts where the surface area rises up becoming the mound or raised surface area. Then past the top of the mound the normal surface area resumes and so do the craters with their incredible vertical rim pieces.
If the proposed dynamo theory mechanism is responsible for the Object's possible magnetic field then at the same time it might also be responsible at least in part for the tremendous subsurface pressures that were present at some time in the past and potentially may still be intermittently present within the crossing Object. To me it seems very evident extreme pressure from within the Object is directly responsible for producing the standing stone style craters and all of the bulging surface areas. Some sort of internal process, maybe the proposed dynamo theory mechanism did and or does in part cause extreme internal pressures to exist within the Object.
May 26, 2018
Mii maanda niigaan da-ni-giizhgak ge-mno-aabjitooyan
Mii maanda sa ge-waabndameg giinwaa waa-bi-zhaayeg
COPY & SAVE & PRINT & SHARE
Familiarize yourself with the details and the sequence of events that I describe.
Numbered 1-5 combined these five separate Return Viewer Guides
describe what a viewer sees actually happening when the speeding forward rolling
Ancient Celestial Object returns and crosses down in front of the Moon.
Even if you decide that you are not going to read anything else, if you read Return Viewer's Guide #1, you will know
the basic idea of what actually happens when the ancient Object returns & crosses down in front of the Moon.
Find in point form Return Viewer's Guide #1, approximately 20% of the way down the page;
Return Viewer's Guide For Use With Or Without A Small Backyard Telescope
print Out The 5_ReturnViewerGuides.pdf
Best Viewed 1024 X 768