The Crossing Down
In days to come you will have good use of this
such are the things you will see you who will come here.
Go to your right...
|Earthshine Plus The Effects Of The Star Bursting Object On The Infant Moon|
Why is the crust on the far side of the Moon thicker than the crust on the near side of the Moon? This is the question being asking by researchers.
I understand it researchers have theorized that
after Theia struck the early Earth causing the
formation of the Moon the extreme heat from the
recently impacted Earth would have still been
tremendous for a period of time after the Moon
cooled. They have also determined that the infant
Moon formed rapidly in an orbit that was much
closer to the Earth compared to it's present day
orbit. In an effort to explain the fact that the
crust on the far side of the Moon is thicker compared
to the crust on the near side of the Moon, the
scientists have come up with a very interesting
theory that has gained acceptance.
I find the Earthshine Theory very interesting. Although I don't understand the details of the chemistry and the math I do get the idea of the Earthshine Theory and it makes sense to me. One reason why the Earthshine Theory makes sense to me is because the hot Earth cooking the near side of the faster cooling Moon while it was orbiting at it's initial close distance seems as if it could or would be a likely possible scenario or probably almost a predictable logical outcome of the collision between Theia and the early Earth.
Unfortunately at this time the fact that retrograde Theia continues to orbit down through between the Moon and the Earth from the time of it's collision with the early Earth up until the present day is unknown to science. Researchers are unable to factor in the crossing Object's powerful forces and possible potential extreme heat and what would have been the resulting powerful additional influences into the Earthshine Theory equation. Another additional factor to be considered is that the Object continued to orbit down through between the Moon and the Earth possibly scorching the Moon and the Earth with extreme heat every orbit down especially in their early history and possibly well into the middle and late history of the Earth and the Moon. It does also appear to be the case where the Object's crossing promoted and caused ongoing geologic activity in both the Moon and the Earth through time as the Moon's orbit gradually became more distant from the Earth. Could the Object's actions have caused the molten Earth to remain molten for a longer period of time also adding to the Earthshine effect on the early Moon?
when scientists try to understand the evidence
available to them in an effort to understand the
Earth and the Moon they are able to see the effects
of the Object's forces but so far they are unable
to translate that into understanding that the
third body that they apparently correctly theorized
in the first place, the impacting Theia central
in the Giant Impact theory, is still in existence
and is still influencing and evolving the Moon
and the Earth today. It was a giant hit and run
impact event. Theia was not absorbed into the
speeding forward rolling crossing and possibly
star bursting Object is a big part of the equation!
The Object is actually a very bizarre type of
astronomical body that I have many questions about.
Clearly it was once geologically active as evidenced
by the surface craters each neatly ringed by massive
towering crater rim pieces that look like they
were blasted upwards towards space by tremendous
subsurface forces. There are no typical impact
craters on the Object's surface that I am aware
of. I saw the rotating side of the Object that
faces the Earth and there are no craters of any
type located in this region. I am going to guess
that the other rotating side or pole that is not
visible from the Earth is probably similar and
there are also no craters located in this region
as well. There are no craters located on the surface
area that leads upwards preceding the top of the
large raised mound surface feature. Everywhere
else on the Object's surface is heavily cratered
with craters all the same in various sizes and
all with the massive towering crater rim pieces
that are bent upwards at their bases. If the surface
of the object was rocky the bases of the vertically
standing crater rim pieces would be fractured
and broken. Of all of the hundreds of craters
I saw I didn't happen to notice a spot were even
just one single crater rim piece was broken off
and was missing. I saw approximately 3/4 of the
Object's cratered surface.
A difficult troubling question is this, could the Object be some sort of intermittently active mini star? These caters appear to have formed when tremendous subsurface pressure blasted the surface layer upwards and outwards. If the Object also became a molten type of place similar to the Earth the crust had to have cooled enough in order for the crater rim pieces to have been formed from the Object's surface crust. Before the possible molten Theia's surface cooled could the Object's molten state combined with it's forward rolling motion be at least partially responsible for the mound feature? From the side the Object has a snail like shape.
Was the Object once the core of a planet with everything now stripped away gone because of the giant impact with the Earth? If it was I'm going to guess that it would have to be a planet that formed around a different star and not our sun because of it speeding orbit down from above and through the plain of the solar system and down into deep space again as it goes around the sun in the opposite direction compared to the planets. None of the planets that formed around the sun behave this way at least as far as I know. It appears to me that because the Object orbits around the sun in the opposite direction compared to the planets it was probably formed by a different process compared to the accretion process that formed the planets unless it formed by accretion around a different star and then somehow ended up in orbit around the sun. I don't know what all the possibilities are but the first thing that needs to be determined is the answer to the question what type of astronomical object is it and then the guessing as to how it formed can begin. Is it actually some type of mini star or a type of object that hasn't been conceived of or theorized? Maybe this is what the core of a planet looks like. Maybe the Giant Impact with the early Earth stripped away all the outer material from Theia leaving a core that looks like it was geologically active at some point with it's surface level volcanic looking craters. Why would the core of this planet if it this is a planet, be geologically active after all of the planet's outer material was lost in the Giant Impact? Is this possible or does this suggest that Theia is an entirely different type of Object and not an ordinary planet? Could the heat generated by the Giant Impact cause the core of a normal planet to end up looking like the Object? Another question I have is what sort of material used to get blasted upwards into space from these craters on an object that is very probably highly metallic in nature? It's not going to be regular lava from rock because there's no rock there as far as I know and I saw around three quarters of the Object's surface. A tremendous subsurface pressure caused tremendous bulging smooth areas to form. These areas are where the craters are located. Around the perimeter edges of these bulging regions that feature the craters there are deep crease mark indentation lines that spread throughout the Object. There are no craters on the turning poles or sides of the Object but in the areas where the centrifugal forces are the greatest the greatest bulging occurred and this is where the craters formed. Moving up from the crease mark indentation lines towards the level area of the bulging surface region where the craters are located it looks like the surface is stretched to the limit containing the subsurface pressure that did ultimately blast upwards from the middle regions of the bulging areas on the Object's surface.
Did the Object look like it does today before it impacted the early Earth? For me a comparison that makes sense is the giant impact that occurred when the Object struck the Earth was like a cannon ball going through a water melon. The collision is not going to bother the cannon ball very much compared to the watermelon. This does lead me to ask did the collision with the early Earth cause the Object to become captured around the sun? Or was the Object already in orbit around the sun and eventually the newly forming Earth just happened to get into the way of the Object's retrograde orbital path?
If the Object was caused to become a captured object around the sun because of the giant impact then somehow the Object's new orbit around the sun caused or resulted in the Object returning to the place in space where the giant impact occurred seeing the Object orbit through the exact place where the impacted Earth was and the debris from the impact was coalescing forming the Moon. Could this happen? Could an impact such as this cause the speeding massive surviving smaller than the Earth object to return to the same place where the impact occurred with the Earth or is it more likely that the Object was already in orbit around the sun and the early Earth eventually crossed paths with the Object, got struck and then became tied into and in resonance with the Object.
An incredible thing to me is that the Object orbits the sun in the opposite direction compared to the Earth and Moon and yet today all three bodies are locked together in close proximity in some sort of recurring intimate fantastic orbital dance.
The Object is obviously intrinsically linked with everything about the Earth's complicated movements and linked with the Moon's very complicated movements and cycles. When the Object crosses down through in front of the Moon it intercepts the Moon's light and drastically changes the way that light looks and behaves. This fact does say something about the true nature of this Moon sized massive Object. The main evidence that tells me that the Earth and Moon are in resonance with the crossing Object is this; Because of the fact that everything that is seen happening in the Moon's drastically Changed Light happens the same way every time this event happens it suggests a repeating cause and effect situation that causes the same end results to happen or to be recreated in and with the Moon's Changed Light. This is very complicated to quickly explain here but for your reference along with the Object itself this topic of the Moon's Changed Light is basically what my website is mainly about. Anyway's I believe that the things that happen in the Moon's Changed Light could only be happening in an exact precisely detailed repeating way if everything else in regards to the Moon and the Earth and the Object and especially in regards to the positioning of the vertical crater rim pieces that cast the shadows into the Changed light, and maybe even the solar system as well was also happening in the same repeating way. As unlikely as this will sound to anyone who reads this and the idea of the Changed Light will and does not make any sense to people as I know very well for myself this is the evidence that I suggest for the idea that the Earth and Moon are in resonance with the Object. I believe that this is solid evidence that will be seen by others again one day and then we shall see what other people including the scientists have to say about this once these people have seen the Object and the Moon's Changed and Lasting Light and they know for themselves what happens. Sorry as usual I tend to wonder off topic.
Earthshine On A Young Moon Theory.
With the absence of the knowledge of the Object
it appears as if the effects that the Object has
had on the Moon has all been attributed to the
molten Earth. Because the Object does exist as
I describe I know that the effects observed on
the Moon were not all caused by the Earth alone
and instead it is clear that it was the molten
Earth in combination with Theia's continuing orbital
action crossing between the Moon and the Earth
that caused the effects observed on the Moon.
I believe it may have been May 25, 1972 when we were looking at the moon using a small backyard telescope and when it was my turn to look at the Moon again I saw the astronomical object that I describe instead.
COPY & SAVE & PRINT & SHARE
Familiarize yourself with the details and the sequence of events that I describe.
Numbered 1-5 combined these five separate Return Viewer Guides
describe what a viewer sees actually happening when the speeding forward rolling
Ancient Celestial Object returns and crosses down in front of the Moon.
Even if you decide that you are not going to read anything else, if you read Return Viewer's Guide #1, you will know
the basic idea of what actually happens when the ancient Object returns & crosses down in front of the Moon.
Find in point form Return Viewer's Guide #1, approximately 20% of the way down the page;
Return Viewer's Guide For Use With Or Without A Small Backyard Telescope
print Out The 5_ReturnViewerGuides.pdf