Compare the gravitational evidence for the existence of planet 9 with the retrograde Object's Basic Flight Path Image and it's possible 46 year and 1 day long orbit along with the position of the solar system's planets on the three possible return dates that I suggest.

May 24, 1926 and May 25, 1972 and May 26, 2018 may be the dates when the Object that I saw returns. Each of those nights occurs 3 nights before the full Moon also these days are separated by 46 years and one day.

Because the astronomers and scientists are completely unaware of the solar system Object I saw and describe and it's incredible orbit they cannot imagine such an object and it's very different type of retrograde orbital behavior so they imagine a very powerful very large object at great distance in a basically familiar style of orbit instead of a very fast very powerful moon size forward rolling object at very close distance to explain the gravitational effects they have observed. Do both exist? Does the distant large powerful object they hypothesize coexist with the Object I saw and describe, maybe? I don't know what all the possibilities are instead I saw the Object and so outside of the facts as I know them I can only point at various facts that are presented by others and make guesses.

Replace the hypothetical Planet Nine in orange shown in the computer simulation below with the orbit of the Object I describe. If the effects that the scientists are observing are related in any way to the Object I describe then the correlation will be obvious to a scientist or anyone who is able to read the data and input the basic Object flight path orbital information I try to provide.

The orbits of the five objects with high-inclination orbits (nearly perpendicular to the ecliptic) are shown
here as cyan ellipses with the hypothetical Planet Nine in orange. Those of four are towards the left in this view,
and that of one (2012 DR30) is towards the right, with an aphelion over 2,000 AU.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Nine

The Object travels at a tremendous speed through between the Moon and the Earth in approximately 5 minutes give or take. Certainly the Object takes less than ten minutes to travel this distance. I used to think it was more like 2-3 minutes but I have at least partially reconsidered and it may actually take up to 5 and even 5 1/2 minutes to travel this distance considering that the crossing angle itself adds distance and time. Could the Object take as long as 6 minutes and a couple seconds to cross through? I have to say maybe because that may actually be the case however less likely 6 minutes or slightly more seems to me. Writing this page caused me to realize that the Object's crossing time could be at least slightly longer than 2-3 minutes.
Size Scales In Our Solar System And The Crossing Object

The Object's top to bottom sink rate of motion is approximately one half of the Object's left to right crossing rate of motion as seen from the Earth.

The Object's forward roll rate is difficult to determine but I'm going to guess it's probably approximately one forward roll per 45 - 65 seconds. Similar to when I'm trying to guess how long it takes for the Object to travel the distance between the Moon and the Earth my guesses concerning the Object's forward roll rate also vary slightly and you will find examples of this throughout all of my writing.

Illustrating the forward rolling crossing Object's orbital path down through between the Moon and the Earth with 100% accuracy is not possible. However in general with a very slight adjustment, The Basic Flight Path image is exactly what the forward rolling Object's orbital crossing angle looks like. Unfortunately there's no way that I know of that would allow me to properly illustrate the Object's incredible speed. Take the Indiana Jones boulder and slow it down and look at it directly in the middle from close up and that does simulate the effect you see when you see the Object however a big difference is that the Object is the size of a small planet and that does have a profound effect on the perspective that viewer has especially when using a small back yard telescope the way I saw the Object.

Adjustment: The left to right crossing angle and the top to bottom sink rate shown might be slightly high. Slightly reduce the left to right crossing angle. Also very slightly reduce the top to bottom sink rate angle and this may be a closer approximation than the angles across and down that are shown in my Basic Flight Path Image.